Difference between revisions of "SolarOccult/IsawaBrian"
(*Subpagey) |
m (Script: fix links messed up in conversion) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | *IsawaBrian/SolarOccultPower -- Shardstasis? What was I THINKING? | + | *[[SolarOccult]] |
| − | *IsawaBrian/SolarOccultSorcery | + | *[[IsawaBrian]] |
| − | *IsawaBrian/SolarOccultSpirit | + | |
| − | *IsawaBrian/SolarOccultThaumaturgy | + | *[[IsawaBrian/SolarOccultPower]] -- Shardstasis? What was I THINKING? |
| + | *[[IsawaBrian/SolarOccultSorcery]] | ||
| + | *[[IsawaBrian/SolarOccultSpirit]] | ||
| + | *[[IsawaBrian/SolarOccultThaumaturgy]] | ||
=== Comments === | === Comments === | ||
| Line 9: | Line 12: | ||
As to why I made Essence 8, 9, and 10 Charms… the progression just seemed <b>logical</b>, you know? They were <i>there</I>. | As to why I made Essence 8, 9, and 10 Charms… the progression just seemed <b>logical</b>, you know? They were <i>there</I>. | ||
| − | On the dice adder and success-adder: these are expensive, and have a willpower cost, unlike most versions of these for "non-combat" abilities because they can directly fuel Sorcery effects, which can very much be combatative. The regular dice-adder and success-buyer can't be, without Fully Independent Actions, because you can't combo Sorcery. -- IsawaBrian | + | On the dice adder and success-adder: these are expensive, and have a willpower cost, unlike most versions of these for "non-combat" abilities because they can directly fuel Sorcery effects, which can very much be combatative. The regular dice-adder and success-buyer can't be, without Fully Independent Actions, because you can't combo Sorcery. -- [[IsawaBrian]] |
<i>I really like the Tham-based charms. Consider them yoinked. - Caelene</i> | <i>I really like the Tham-based charms. Consider them yoinked. - Caelene</i> | ||
| − | :Thanks! Hope they work well for you! --IsawaBrian | + | :Thanks! Hope they work well for you! --[[IsawaBrian]] |
The 10/10 charm made me pull strange faces at the thought of that much power in the hands of PCs, so it's probably about the right level. :P - [[Falcon]] | The 10/10 charm made me pull strange faces at the thought of that much power in the hands of PCs, so it's probably about the right level. :P - [[Falcon]] | ||
| − | :Snerk. Yeah. It's not the sort of thing a PC should really ever have... it was closer to a thought experiment than a real Charm. --IsawaBrian | + | :Snerk. Yeah. It's not the sort of thing a PC should really ever have... it was closer to a thought experiment than a real Charm. --[[IsawaBrian]] |
Latest revision as of 02:28, 9 June 2010
- IsawaBrian/SolarOccultPower -- Shardstasis? What was I THINKING?
- IsawaBrian/SolarOccultSorcery
- IsawaBrian/SolarOccultSpirit
- IsawaBrian/SolarOccultThaumaturgy
Comments
Note: the ‘affects Essential Nature’ too Charms are unavailable to Abyssals because they require a certain level of _self_ harmony that is not found in the Abyssal Shard. Obviously, I can’t tell you how to play your games or make your charms; just my thoughts on them.
As to why I made Essence 8, 9, and 10 Charms… the progression just seemed logical, you know? They were there.
On the dice adder and success-adder: these are expensive, and have a willpower cost, unlike most versions of these for "non-combat" abilities because they can directly fuel Sorcery effects, which can very much be combatative. The regular dice-adder and success-buyer can't be, without Fully Independent Actions, because you can't combo Sorcery. -- IsawaBrian
I really like the Tham-based charms. Consider them yoinked. - Caelene
- Thanks! Hope they work well for you! --IsawaBrian
The 10/10 charm made me pull strange faces at the thought of that much power in the hands of PCs, so it's probably about the right level. :P - Falcon
- Snerk. Yeah. It's not the sort of thing a PC should really ever have... it was closer to a thought experiment than a real Charm. --IsawaBrian
