Difference between revisions of "FixTheSloppyEditing/CasteBookEclipse"

From Exalted - Unofficial Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Agree)
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Nothing yet.
+
||Page||Type|[Description||Reporter||
 +
||75||UNCLEAR|[Grasping Claw Method has an Essence Minimum of 5, despite the preceding Charm requiring Essence 2 and the next Charm requiring Essence 3.||[[Resplendence]]||
  
 
== Comments ==
 
== Comments ==
  
This must be an error - page 75, Grasping Claw Method. Essence 5 <i>has</i> to be an error, since the preceeding Mantis Form is Essence 2. Also, a Simple disarm at +MA dice for 3 motes? Mighty weak at that level, if you ask me, but this might be something for a house rule. I myself have made it a MA 5, Essence 3, Supplemental charm that counts  extra successes on a parry towards a disarm attempt. [[Resplendence]]
+
Grasping Claw Method is suggested to require Essence 3. [[Resplendence]]
 
 
:I don't have that book, but an Essence 5 charm following an Essence 2 charm isn't clearly an error (though the reverse would be).  I'd suggest moving the house rule to [[FixTheSolarCharmTrees]]. --[[Toram]]
 
 
 
::Would it count as an error if the Charm falls between two other charms - the preceding charm is 4 MA and 2 Ess reqs, the following charm is 5 MA and 3 Ess, and the charm in betweeen is 4 MA and 5 Ess. That's...rather clearly a mistake, I'd think - that is, as you said, it's the reverse, in which a charm is immediately followed by a lower-Essence charm. ~ BerserkSeraph
 
 
 
:::I agree; the preceding charm in that case is irrelevant, but any charm with lower prereqs than any of its own prereqs has to be in error.  --[[Toram]]
 

Latest revision as of 15:10, 7 March 2005

||Page||Type|[Description||Reporter|| ||75||UNCLEAR|[Grasping Claw Method has an Essence Minimum of 5, despite the preceding Charm requiring Essence 2 and the next Charm requiring Essence 3.||Resplendence||

Comments

Grasping Claw Method is suggested to require Essence 3. Resplendence