Difference between revisions of "Exalted In The OWoD"

From Exalted - Unofficial Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (link fix)
m
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<b>Before a there was a World of Darkness</b>. . .or was it after we were never quite sure of that.
 
<b>Before a there was a World of Darkness</b>. . .or was it after we were never quite sure of that.
  
Okay we likely all remember the previews, or don’t, that hinted, needled, and implied that Creation was true past of the World of Darkness so that for once a new line from WW didn’t tank due to the intractability of their customer base.  Grabowski is even reported to have considered each splat analogous…uhm at least the predecessor of one of the others in the old version of the World of Darkness (called o[[WoD]] throughout my posts); this was the line with Vampire the Masquerade, Werewolf the Apocalypse, Mage the Ascension, Changeling the Dreaming, Wraith the Oblivion, Hunter the Reckoning and many more iterations and subtypes and splats and now its gone…
+
Okay we likely all remember the previews, or don’t, that hinted, needled, and implied that Creation was true past of the World of Darkness so that for once a new line from WW didn’t tank due to the intractability of their customer base.  Grabowski is even reported to have considered each splat analogous…uhm at least the predecessor of one of the others in the old version of the World of Darkness (called oWoD throughout my posts); this was the line with Vampire the Masquerade, Werewolf the Apocalypse, Mage the Ascension, Changeling the Dreaming, Wraith the Oblivion, Hunter the Reckoning and many more iterations and subtypes and splats and now its gone…
  
 
This page's purpose is to host for my and others and your ideas on how the two may relate as well as possible means to cross them over or just fun and relevant information for consideration of each line.
 
This page's purpose is to host for my and others and your ideas on how the two may relate as well as possible means to cross them over or just fun and relevant information for consideration of each line.
Line 12: Line 12:
  
  
*/[[Another Fine End-Myth]] Ideas of the Apocalypse from the Players of Darkness<br>
+
[[Another Fine End-Myth]] Ideas of the Apocalypse from the Players of Darkness<br>
*/[[Abyssals vs. Methuselahs]]  Select portions of the discussion that prompted me to start contributing to wiki.<br>
+
[[Abyssals vs. Methuselahs]]  Select portions of the discussion that prompted me to start contributing to wiki.<br>
*/[[The Imbued and The Superior Model]] Can’t we just get along, What if we did or need to?<br>
+
[[The Imbued and The Superior Model]]Can’t we just get along, What if we did or need to?<br>
 
= Comments  =
 
= Comments  =

Revision as of 03:20, 1 November 2007

Back to Martikhoras

Before a there was a World of Darkness. . .or was it after we were never quite sure of that.

Okay we likely all remember the previews, or don’t, that hinted, needled, and implied that Creation was true past of the World of Darkness so that for once a new line from WW didn’t tank due to the intractability of their customer base. Grabowski is even reported to have considered each splat analogous…uhm at least the predecessor of one of the others in the old version of the World of Darkness (called oWoD throughout my posts); this was the line with Vampire the Masquerade, Werewolf the Apocalypse, Mage the Ascension, Changeling the Dreaming, Wraith the Oblivion, Hunter the Reckoning and many more iterations and subtypes and splats and now its gone…

This page's purpose is to host for my and others and your ideas on how the two may relate as well as possible means to cross them over or just fun and relevant information for consideration of each line.

Begin.

Experiments

Another Fine End-Myth Ideas of the Apocalypse from the Players of Darkness
Abyssals vs. Methuselahs Select portions of the discussion that prompted me to start contributing to wiki.
The Imbued and The Superior ModelCan’t we just get along, What if we did or need to?

Comments