Difference between revisions of "Thus Spake Zarasnead/CelestialBattleArmourRepairRating"
From Exalted - Unofficial Wiki
m (link fix) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Re: (Exalted) Celestial Battle Armor | Re: (Exalted) Celestial Battle Armor | ||
| − | + | *Quote:(Originally Posted by Argent) | |
| − | + | **I would say, since it is roughly on par with the Dragon Armors (which are Artifact 4) - in some cases arguably worse - that it is Artifact 5 precisely because it needs no maintenance. The alternative does not make much sense in context. | |
| − | I wrote up CBA, and I definitely agree that it should not require maintenance - it's a creation of the High First Age, and like most things made then, it shouldn't. From my | + | I wrote up CBA, and I definitely agree that it should not require maintenance - it's a creation of the High First Age, and like most things made then, it shouldn't. From my PoV, most devices that require maintenance were either made for Dragon-Blooded or during the Shogunate. I'd assume that Repair 3 only matters if the armor is damaged and requires repair. |
Revision as of 10:25, 20 April 2009
From RPG.net 20th April 2009
Re: (Exalted) Celestial Battle Armor
- Quote:(Originally Posted by Argent)
- I would say, since it is roughly on par with the Dragon Armors (which are Artifact 4) - in some cases arguably worse - that it is Artifact 5 precisely because it needs no maintenance. The alternative does not make much sense in context.
I wrote up CBA, and I definitely agree that it should not require maintenance - it's a creation of the High First Age, and like most things made then, it shouldn't. From my PoV, most devices that require maintenance were either made for Dragon-Blooded or during the Shogunate. I'd assume that Repair 3 only matters if the armor is damaged and requires repair.
