Difference between revisions of "FixTheSloppyEditing/CasteBookEclipse"
From Exalted - Unofficial Wiki
m |
(*Addendum) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | Nothing yet. | |
− | |||
== Comments == | == Comments == | ||
− | Grasping Claw Method is | + | This must be an error - page 75, Grasping Claw Method. Essence 5 <i>has</i> to be an error, since the preceeding Mantis Form is Essence 2. Also, a Simple disarm at +MA dice for 3 motes? Mighty weak at that level, if you ask me, but this might be something for a house rule. I myself have made it a MA 5, Essence 3, Supplemental charm that counts extra successes on a parry towards a disarm attempt. [[Resplendence]] |
+ | |||
+ | :I don't have that book, but an Essence 5 charm following an Essence 2 charm isn't clearly an error (though the reverse would be). I'd suggest moving the house rule to [[FixTheSolarCharmTrees]]. --[[Toram]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Would it count as an error if the Charm falls between two other charms - the preceding charm is 4 MA and 2 Ess reqs, the following charm is 5 MA and 3 Ess, and the charm in betweeen is 4 MA and 5 Ess. That's...rather clearly a mistake, I'd think - that is, as you said, it's the reverse, in which a charm is immediately followed by a lower-Essence charm. ~ BerserkSeraph |
Revision as of 21:27, 2 March 2005
Nothing yet.
Comments
This must be an error - page 75, Grasping Claw Method. Essence 5 has to be an error, since the preceeding Mantis Form is Essence 2. Also, a Simple disarm at +MA dice for 3 motes? Mighty weak at that level, if you ask me, but this might be something for a house rule. I myself have made it a MA 5, Essence 3, Supplemental charm that counts extra successes on a parry towards a disarm attempt. Resplendence
- I don't have that book, but an Essence 5 charm following an Essence 2 charm isn't clearly an error (though the reverse would be). I'd suggest moving the house rule to FixTheSolarCharmTrees. --Toram
- Would it count as an error if the Charm falls between two other charms - the preceding charm is 4 MA and 2 Ess reqs, the following charm is 5 MA and 3 Ess, and the charm in betweeen is 4 MA and 5 Ess. That's...rather clearly a mistake, I'd think - that is, as you said, it's the reverse, in which a charm is immediately followed by a lower-Essence charm. ~ BerserkSeraph