Difference between revisions of "WikiStatus"
From Exalted - Unofficial Wiki
m |
m (link fix) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Currently, the wiki is read-only to anonymous editors due to page-blanking spam. To edit, all you need to do is go to the[http://exalted.xi.co.nz/wiki/wiki.pl?action=editprefs preferences] page and enter 'exalted' into the Administrator Password field. This will allow you to edit pages - it'll be stored in a cookie so you only need to do it once for the moment. - [[Xyphoid]] | Currently, the wiki is read-only to anonymous editors due to page-blanking spam. To edit, all you need to do is go to the[http://exalted.xi.co.nz/wiki/wiki.pl?action=editprefs preferences] page and enter 'exalted' into the Administrator Password field. This will allow you to edit pages - it'll be stored in a cookie so you only need to do it once for the moment. - [[Xyphoid]] | ||
− | :Does this page get frequently used for Status updates? If so, should it become a top level page? - EwindaleMoss | + | :Does this page get frequently used for Status updates? If so, should it become a top level page? - [[EwindaleMoss]] |
+ | :: Nope, I would put status updates on the main page. This was more created because I needed a page to link the message when you're not logged in - Xy |
Revision as of 08:08, 5 April 2010
Currently, the wiki is read-only to anonymous editors due to page-blanking spam. To edit, all you need to do is go to thepreferences page and enter 'exalted' into the Administrator Password field. This will allow you to edit pages - it'll be stored in a cookie so you only need to do it once for the moment. - Xyphoid
- Does this page get frequently used for Status updates? If so, should it become a top level page? - EwindaleMoss
- Nope, I would put status updates on the main page. This was more created because I needed a page to link the message when you're not logged in - Xy