|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Nothing yet.
| + | ||Page||Type|[Description||Reporter|| |
| | + | ||75||UNCLEAR|[Grasping Claw Method has an Essence Minimum of 5, despite the preceding Charm requiring Essence 2 and the next Charm requiring Essence 3.||[[Resplendence]]|| |
| | | | |
| | == Comments == | | == Comments == |
| | | | |
| − | This must be an error - page 75, Grasping Claw Method. Essence 5 <i>has</i> to be an error, since the preceeding Mantis Form is Essence 2. Also, a Simple disarm at +MA dice for 3 motes? Mighty weak at that level, if you ask me, but this might be something for a house rule. I myself have made it a MA 5, Essence 3, Supplemental charm that counts extra successes on a parry towards a disarm attempt. [[Resplendence]]
| + | Grasping Claw Method is suggested to require Essence 3. [[Resplendence]] |
| − | | |
| − | :I don't have that book, but an Essence 5 charm following an Essence 2 charm isn't clearly an error (though the reverse would be). I'd suggest moving the house rule to [[FixTheSolarCharmTrees]]. --[[Toram]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::Would it count as an error if the Charm falls between two other charms - the preceding charm is 4 MA and 2 Ess reqs, the following charm is 5 MA and 3 Ess, and the charm in betweeen is 4 MA and 5 Ess. That's...rather clearly a mistake, I'd think - that is, as you said, it's the reverse, in which a charm is immediately followed by a lower-Essence charm. ~ BerserkSeraph
| |
| − | | |
| − | :::I agree; the preceding charm in that case is irrelevant, but any charm with lower prereqs than any of its own prereqs has to be in error. --[[Toram]]
| |
Latest revision as of 15:10, 7 March 2005
||Page||Type|[Description||Reporter||
||75||UNCLEAR|[Grasping Claw Method has an Essence Minimum of 5, despite the preceding Charm requiring Essence 2 and the next Charm requiring Essence 3.||Resplendence||
Grasping Claw Method is suggested to require Essence 3. Resplendence
