WhatExaltedWikiShouldBe - Revision history

Conversion script: link fix

2010-04-06T01:18:23Z

link fix

Conversion script: link fix

2010-04-05T08:08:36Z

link fix

Conversion script: link fix

2010-04-03T09:06:12Z

link fix

Dimitryi: *

2004-04-21T19:37:09Z

New page

Here is what I think.

What ExaltedWiki is.
* Much of ExaltedWiki consists of a big database of custom [[Charms]], [[Artifacts]], HearthStones, and what-have-you. This content is mainly assumed to be static. Some of it is posted by the creators themselves; some is archived from other sources.
* There are some areas which are devoted to explicitly collaborative projects, like WhirlWindBrushMethod or LexiconOfElderDays.
* It's also a place for Exalted fans to interact. It's unlike an actual bulletin board, because a lot of the mingling goes on backstage, via email, chat, or actual bulleting boards. What it does is give people a very easy, accessible way to put their work on display, and see other people's ideas. It is unlike a collection of RealWebSites in that it's all one big blob, and that big blob all has to do with Exalted.

What ExaltedWiki should be.
* It should be an integrated blob of Exalted stuff. By this, I mean that there should be more cross-linking, and less apprehension about writing content which is explicitly inspired by other ExaltedWiki content. We should make efforts to ensure that our methods of WikiOrganization encourage this.
* It should welcome all forms of expression. Organic, collaborative projects are great, but so is finished CustomContent. We aren't all playing in the same game, so it's naive to think that CustomContent should be thrown completely open to the public, in the belief that some kind of DynamicEquilibrium will be reached. By the same token, ExaltedWiki should be a community, not an archipelago; treating WikiAsMicrocosmOfWeb ignores its potential. Skewing too much in favor of one model is to ignore the fact that both have value. As a wise CRPG character once said, "There must be balance, in all things."

_[[Ikselam]]

I entirely agree. "Integrated blob" is probably the best term I've heard yet. :p - [[Dimitryi]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Here is what I think.
-What ExaltedWiki <i>is</i>.
+What [[ExaltedWiki]] <i>is</i>.
-* Much of ExaltedWiki consists of a big database of custom [[Charms]], [[Artifacts]], HearthStones, and what-have-you. This content is mainly assumed to be static. Some of it is posted by the creators themselves; some is archived from other sources.
+* Much of [[ExaltedWiki]] consists of a big database of custom [[Charms]], [[Artifacts]], [[HearthStones]], and what-have-you. This content is mainly assumed to be static. Some of it is posted by the creators themselves; some is archived from other sources.
-* There are some areas which are devoted to explicitly collaborative projects, like WhirlWindBrushMethod or LexiconOfElderDays.
+* There are some areas which are devoted to explicitly collaborative projects, like [[WhirlWindBrushMethod]] or [[LexiconOfElderDays]].
-* It's also a place for Exalted fans to interact. It's unlike an actual bulletin board, because a lot of the mingling goes on backstage, via email, chat, or actual bulleting boards. What it does is give people a very easy, accessible way to put their work on display, and see other people's ideas. It is unlike a collection of RealWebSites in that it's all one big blob, and that big blob all has to do with Exalted.
+* It's also a place for Exalted fans to interact. It's unlike an actual bulletin board, because a lot of the mingling goes on backstage, via email, chat, or actual bulleting boards. What it does is give people a very easy, accessible way to put their work on display, and see other people's ideas. It is unlike a collection of [[RealWebSites]] in that it's all one big blob, and that big blob all has to do with Exalted.
-What ExaltedWiki <i>should</i> be.
+What [[ExaltedWiki]] <i>should</i> be.
-* It should be an <i>integrated</i> blob of Exalted stuff. By this, I mean that there should be more cross-linking, and less apprehension about writing content which is explicitly inspired by other ExaltedWiki content. We should make efforts to ensure that our methods of WikiOrganization encourage this.
+* It should be an <i>integrated</i> blob of Exalted stuff. By this, I mean that there should be more cross-linking, and less apprehension about writing content which is explicitly inspired by other [[ExaltedWiki]] content. We should make efforts to ensure that our methods of [[WikiOrganization]] encourage this.
-* It should welcome all forms of expression. Organic, collaborative projects are great, but so is finished CustomContent. We aren't all playing in the same game, so it's naive to think that CustomContent should be thrown completely open to the public, in the belief that some kind of DynamicEquilibrium will be reached. By the same token, ExaltedWiki should be a community, not an archipelago; treating WikiAsMicrocosmOfWeb ignores its potential. Skewing too much in favor of one model is to ignore the fact that <i>both</i> have value. As a wise CRPG character once said, "There must be balance, in all things."
+* It should welcome all forms of expression. Organic, collaborative projects are great, but so is finished [[CustomContent]]. We aren't all playing in the same game, so it's naive to think that [[CustomContent]] should be thrown completely open to the public, in the belief that some kind of [[DynamicEquilibrium]] will be reached. By the same token, [[ExaltedWiki]] should be a community, not an archipelago; treating [[WikiAsMicrocosmOfWeb]] ignores its potential. Skewing too much in favor of one model is to ignore the fact that <i>both</i> have value. As a wise CRPG character once said, "There must be balance, in all things."
 _[[Ikselam]]
 I entirely agree.  "Integrated blob" is probably the best term I've heard yet. :p  - [[Dimitryi]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:18, 6 April 2010
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:08, 5 April 2010
(No difference)