<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://exalted.xi.co.nz/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thus_Spake_Zargrabowski%2FArmorComparison</id>
		<title>Thus Spake Zargrabowski/ArmorComparison - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://exalted.xi.co.nz/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thus_Spake_Zargrabowski%2FArmorComparison"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://exalted.xi.co.nz/w/index.php?title=Thus_Spake_Zargrabowski/ArmorComparison&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-09T15:46:47Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.29.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://exalted.xi.co.nz/w/index.php?title=Thus_Spake_Zargrabowski/ArmorComparison&amp;diff=41216&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>MetalFatigue: *breastplates protect the vitals only</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://exalted.xi.co.nz/w/index.php?title=Thus_Spake_Zargrabowski/ArmorComparison&amp;diff=41216&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2004-03-31T22:28:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;*breastplates protect the vitals only&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;On 24 Mar 02, at 13:03, Paul Fanning wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does a breastplate offer more protection against lethal damage than against bashing?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Breastplates and Greek-style hoplite armor or Japanese light armor (both of which fall under &amp;quot;reinforced breastplate&amp;quot;) are armor focussed around providing vitals protection. They stay light and flexible by limiting the protected areas to the stuff you really can't live without. Thus, the bashing soak is low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geoffrey C. Grabowski\\&lt;br /&gt;
Exalted Developer, WWGS\\&lt;br /&gt;
raindog@white-wolf.com&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MetalFatigue</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>