http://exalted.xi.co.nz/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=SuturedDefenseValue%2FPacingIntentSuturedDefenseValue/PacingIntent - Revision history2026-04-10T01:47:29ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.29.0http://exalted.xi.co.nz/w/index.php?title=SuturedDefenseValue/PacingIntent&diff=71981&oldid=prevConversion script: link fix2010-04-06T01:17:32Z<p>link fix</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 01:17, 6 April 2010</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>Conversion scripthttp://exalted.xi.co.nz/w/index.php?title=SuturedDefenseValue/PacingIntent&diff=54817&oldid=prevConversion script: link fix2010-04-05T08:07:55Z<p>link fix</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:07, 5 April 2010</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>Conversion scripthttp://exalted.xi.co.nz/w/index.php?title=SuturedDefenseValue/PacingIntent&diff=34303&oldid=prevConversion script: link fix2010-04-03T09:04:54Z<p>link fix</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:04, 3 April 2010</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>It appears that one of the main rationales for using static defense in Second Edition was to speed play by eliminating defensive rolling. This benefit is largely eliminated by the existence of roll adders like the First Excellency, which add defensive rolling right back into the game. Under this variation, all defensive roll adders are treated as pool adders instead. Using this variant does not change the ''average'' effect of stunts and the First Excellency, but eliminates their variability, as well as minimum and maximum contribution. Note that First and Second Excellencies do ''not'' behave exactly the same way in this case because, now being a pool adder, the First would be applied at a different point in the Order of Modifiers (ex2e.124) than the Second. In most cases, however, the result of both would become identical.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>It appears that one of the main rationales for using static defense in Second Edition was to speed play by eliminating defensive rolling. This benefit is largely eliminated by the existence of roll adders like the First Excellency, which add defensive rolling right back into the game. Under this variation, all defensive roll adders are treated as pool adders instead. Using this variant does not change the ''average'' effect of stunts and the First Excellency, but eliminates their variability, as well as minimum and maximum contribution. Note that First and Second Excellencies do ''not'' behave exactly the same way in this case because, now being a pool adder, the First would be applied at a different point in the Order of Modifiers (ex2e.124) than the Second. In most cases, however, the result of both would become identical.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>* Back to SuturedDefenseValue</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>* Back to <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">[[</ins>SuturedDefenseValue<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">]]</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>== Comments ==</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>== Comments ==</div></td></tr>
</table>Conversion scripthttp://exalted.xi.co.nz/w/index.php?title=SuturedDefenseValue/PacingIntent&diff=34302&oldid=prevWordman: A stitch in DV2007-03-20T03:39:47Z<p>A stitch in DV</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>It appears that one of the main rationales for using static defense in Second Edition was to speed play by eliminating defensive rolling. This benefit is largely eliminated by the existence of roll adders like the First Excellency, which add defensive rolling right back into the game. Under this variation, all defensive roll adders are treated as pool adders instead. Using this variant does not change the ''average'' effect of stunts and the First Excellency, but eliminates their variability, as well as minimum and maximum contribution. Note that First and Second Excellencies do ''not'' behave exactly the same way in this case because, now being a pool adder, the First would be applied at a different point in the Order of Modifiers (ex2e.124) than the Second. In most cases, however, the result of both would become identical.<br />
<br />
* Back to SuturedDefenseValue<br />
<br />
== Comments ==</div>Wordman