ReFactor - Revision history

Conversion script: link fix

2010-04-06T01:17:31Z

link fix

Conversion script: link fix

2010-04-05T08:07:53Z

link fix

Show changes

Conversion script: link fix

2010-04-03T09:04:51Z

link fix

FluffySquirrel: *

2005-01-08T23:19:40Z

New page

ReFactor
: verb
: To reformat to increase clarity and present content more effectively. This shouldn't be a way to DisagreeByDeleting. If there is something that is still under discussion, it should be moved to the bottom of the page so further discussion can continue to take place even as the content that is worked out is cleaned up and presented properly.

For example, if a page about LunarMartialArtsPowerLevels decides that yes, Lunars are better MAists and can clearly show why they are, then the discussion on the subject (the parts that are closed) should be deleted and the arguments for Luner MA superiority should be clearly presented at the top of the page. If another subject is still under discussion, it can:
# Be moved to a /Discussion subpage.
# Be moved to the bottom of the page under a horisontal rule.

The correct course of action depends on the length of the discussion and its level of activity. R

Remember, ReFactoring is a necessary part of the wiki life cycle, and it's also something that must be done with care. Don't EVER DisagreeByDeleting someone else's content, under the pretense of ReFactoring. Also, make sure to read the page in question carefully before attempting to ReFactor.

ReFactoring a page is not considered to be an insult! Indeed, it means that the people have reached a clear opinion and instead it is a compliment. Your opinions have just been condensed so that future readers can understand them more quickly.

ReFactor if you want to be a true WikiGnome. :)

209.88.128.9 at 23:04, 8 January 2005

2005-01-08T23:04:59Z

Show changes

DaveFayram: Explaining what a ReFactor is meant to be.

2004-04-21T17:18:15Z

Explaining what a ReFactor is meant to be.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 For example, if a page about [[LunarMartialArtsPowerLevels]] decides that yes, Lunars are better MAists and can clearly show why they are, then the discussion on the subject (the parts that are closed) should be deleted and the arguments for Luner MA superiority should be clearly presented at the top of the page. If another subject is still under discussion, it can:
-# Be moved to a [[ReFactor/Discussion]] subpage.
+# Be moved to a[[ReFactor/Discussion]] subpage.
 # Be moved to the bottom of the page under a horisontal rule.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-ReFactor
+[[ReFactor]]
 : <i>verb</i>
-: To reformat to increase clarity and present content more effectively. This shouldn't be a way to DisagreeByDeleting. If there is something that is still under discussion, it should be moved to the bottom of the page so further discussion can continue to take place even as the content that is worked out is cleaned up and presented properly.
+: To reformat to increase clarity and present content more effectively. This shouldn't be a way to [[DisagreeByDeleting]]. If there is something that is still under discussion, it should be moved to the bottom of the page so further discussion can continue to take place even as the content that is worked out is cleaned up and presented properly.
-For example, if a page about LunarMartialArtsPowerLevels decides that yes, Lunars are better MAists and can clearly show why they are, then the discussion on the subject (the parts that are closed) should be deleted and the arguments for Luner MA superiority should be clearly presented at the top of the page. If another subject is still under discussion, it can:
+For example, if a page about [[LunarMartialArtsPowerLevels]] decides that yes, Lunars are better MAists and can clearly show why they are, then the discussion on the subject (the parts that are closed) should be deleted and the arguments for Luner MA superiority should be clearly presented at the top of the page. If another subject is still under discussion, it can:
-# Be moved to a /Discussion subpage.
+# Be moved to a [[/Discussion]] subpage.
 # Be moved to the bottom of the page under a horisontal rule.
 The correct course of action depends on the length of the discussion and its level of activity. R
-<b>Remember</b>, ReFactoring is a necessary part of the wiki life cycle, and it's also something that must be done with care. Don't EVER DisagreeByDeleting someone else's content, under the pretense of ReFactoring. Also, make sure to read the page in question carefully before attempting to ReFactor.
+<b>Remember</b>, [[ReFactoring]] is a necessary part of the wiki life cycle, and it's also something that must be done with care. Don't EVER [[DisagreeByDeleting]] someone else's content, under the pretense of [[ReFactoring]]. Also, make sure to read the page in question carefully before attempting to [[ReFactor]].
-<b>ReFactor</b><b>ing</b> a page is not considered to be an insult! Indeed, it means that the people have reached a clear opinion and instead it is a compliment. Your opinions have just been condensed so that future readers can understand them more quickly.
+<b>[[ReFactor]]</b><b>ing</b> a page is not considered to be an insult! Indeed, it means that the people have reached a clear opinion and instead it is a compliment. Your opinions have just been condensed so that future readers can understand them more quickly.
-ReFactor if you want to be a true WikiGnome. :)
+[[ReFactor]] if you want to be a true [[WikiGnome]]. :)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[[ReFactor]]
+ReFactor
 : <i>verb</i>
-: To reformat to increase clarity and present content more effectively. This shouldn't be a way to [[DisagreeByDeleting]]. If there is something that is still under discussion, it should be moved to the bottom of the page so further discussion can continue to take place even as the content that is worked out is cleaned up and presented properly.
+: To reformat to increase clarity and present content more effectively. This shouldn't be a way to DisagreeByDeleting. If there is something that is still under discussion, it should be moved to the bottom of the page so further discussion can continue to take place even as the content that is worked out is cleaned up and presented properly.
-For example, if a page about [[LunarMartialArtsPowerLevels]] decides that yes, Lunars are better MAists and can clearly show why they are, then the discussion on the subject (the parts that are closed) should be deleted and the arguments for Luner MA superiority should be clearly presented at the top of the page. If another subject is still under discussion, it can:
+For example, if a page about LunarMartialArtsPowerLevels decides that yes, Lunars are better MAists and can clearly show why they are, then the discussion on the subject (the parts that are closed) should be deleted and the arguments for Luner MA superiority should be clearly presented at the top of the page. If another subject is still under discussion, it can:
-# Be moved to a [[/Discussion]] subpage.
+# Be moved to a /Discussion subpage.
 # Be moved to the bottom of the page under a horisontal rule.
 The correct course of action depends on the length of the discussion and its level of activity. R
-<b>Remember</b>, [[ReFactoring]] is a necessary part of the wiki life cycle, and it's also something that must be done with care. Don't EVER [[DisagreeByDeleting]] someone else's content, under the pretense of [[ReFactoring]]. Also, make sure to read the page in question carefully before attempting to [[ReFactor]].
+<b>Remember</b>, ReFactoring is a necessary part of the wiki life cycle, and it's also something that must be done with care. Don't EVER DisagreeByDeleting someone else's content, under the pretense of ReFactoring. Also, make sure to read the page in question carefully before attempting to ReFactor.
-<b>[[ReFactor]]</b><b>ing</b> a page is not considered to be an insult! Indeed, it means that the people have reached a clear opinion and instead it is a compliment. Your opinions have just been condensed so that future readers can understand them more quickly.
+<b>ReFactor</b><b>ing</b> a page is not considered to be an insult! Indeed, it means that the people have reached a clear opinion and instead it is a compliment. Your opinions have just been condensed so that future readers can understand them more quickly.
-[[ReFactor]] if you want to be a true [[WikiGnome]]. :)
+ReFactor if you want to be a true WikiGnome. :)