BerserkSeraph/LordsandLadies - Revision history

Conversion script: link fix

2010-04-06T01:15:20Z

link fix

Conversion script: link fix

2010-04-06T00:35:04Z

link fix

Conversion script: link fix

2010-04-05T08:06:11Z

link fix

Show changes

Conversion script: link fix

2010-04-03T09:02:17Z

link fix

David.: *despam

2005-02-27T02:10:51Z

*despam

Show changes

Ppp-203.144.143.7.revip.asianet.co.th at 00:41, 27 February 2005

2005-02-27T00:41:08Z

Show changes

BerserkSeraph: *

2005-02-26T00:05:51Z

@@ Line 158: / Line 158: @@
 I'd just like to say that quoting a Pratchett novel and making Fair Folk similar to his elves gets you...I dunno.  Cookies.  And pie.  Lots of cookies and pie.  I like this very much.  - [[Hulen]]
-:Making? I'd say they were even before I tried to define them to myself at length. They're the <i>old</i> fair folk myths. And while I'm lukewarm to pie, I will accept cookies gleefully. ~ BerserkSeraph
+:Making? I'd say they were even before I tried to define them to myself at length. They're the <i>old</i> fair folk myths. And while I'm lukewarm to pie, I will accept cookies gleefully. ~ [[BerserkSeraph]]
 A couple of quotes that this brings to mind are:
@@ Line 164: / Line 164: @@
 <i> "There's no grays, only white that's got grubby.  I'm suprised you don't know that.  And sin, young man, is when you treat people as things.  Including yourself.  That's what sin is." </i> -- Carpe Jugulum, Terry Pratchett
-And I can't find my copy of Lords And Ladies but the bit in there about the elves not having any empathy seemed worth mentioning.  Nice work dude.  <br> --BrilliantRain
+And I can't find my copy of Lords And Ladies but the bit in there about the elves not having any empathy seemed worth mentioning.  Nice work dude.  <br> --[[BrilliantRain]]
 Just too cool. --[[MF]]
@@ Line 170: / Line 170: @@
 I think Veshesha means qualities in the sense of those things that separate one from another.  Given one dictionary I've been looking at describes nirveshesha as 'ordinary' anyway. -[[Xeriar]]
-:Good catch - I did a bit more research and the term is more accurately 'without particularity' - so if Nirveshesha is without definition between itself and others, than the Ring is that difference. Thanks for the assist, Xeriar. ~ BerserkSeraph
+:Good catch - I did a bit more research and the term is more accurately 'without particularity' - so if Nirveshesha is without definition between itself and others, than the Ring is that difference. Thanks for the assist, Xeriar. ~ [[BerserkSeraph]]
 :Perhaps it's "qualities" in the Aristotelian sense? Only that would be a little backwards, because if I were going to try to tie the shinma to concepts from Aristotelian philosophy, I'd say that Nirakara was that which is without accidents, and Nirvishesha was that which is without essential nature. Or...wait. Nirguna ought to fit into that somehow...never mind.... --[[MF]]
-::Whee! I've already forgotten! ~BerserkSeraph <i>Being slightly crazier than usual</i>
+::Whee! I've already forgotten! ~[[BerserkSeraph]] <i>Being slightly crazier than usual</i>

@@ Line 158: / Line 158: @@
 I'd just like to say that quoting a Pratchett novel and making Fair Folk similar to his elves gets you...I dunno.  Cookies.  And pie.  Lots of cookies and pie.  I like this very much.  - [[Hulen]]
-:Making? I'd say they were even before I tried to define them to myself at length. They're the <i>old</i> fair folk myths. And while I'm lukewarm to pie, I will accept cookies gleefully. ~ [[BerserkSeraph]]
+:Making? I'd say they were even before I tried to define them to myself at length. They're the <i>old</i> fair folk myths. And while I'm lukewarm to pie, I will accept cookies gleefully. ~ BerserkSeraph
 A couple of quotes that this brings to mind are:
@@ Line 164: / Line 164: @@
 <i> "There's no grays, only white that's got grubby.  I'm suprised you don't know that.  And sin, young man, is when you treat people as things.  Including yourself.  That's what sin is." </i> -- Carpe Jugulum, Terry Pratchett
-And I can't find my copy of Lords And Ladies but the bit in there about the elves not having any empathy seemed worth mentioning.  Nice work dude.  <br> --[[BrilliantRain]]
+And I can't find my copy of Lords And Ladies but the bit in there about the elves not having any empathy seemed worth mentioning.  Nice work dude.  <br> --BrilliantRain
 Just too cool. --[[MF]]
@@ Line 170: / Line 170: @@
 I think Veshesha means qualities in the sense of those things that separate one from another.  Given one dictionary I've been looking at describes nirveshesha as 'ordinary' anyway. -[[Xeriar]]
-:Good catch - I did a bit more research and the term is more accurately 'without particularity' - so if Nirveshesha is without definition between itself and others, than the Ring is that difference. Thanks for the assist, Xeriar. ~ [[BerserkSeraph]]
+:Good catch - I did a bit more research and the term is more accurately 'without particularity' - so if Nirveshesha is without definition between itself and others, than the Ring is that difference. Thanks for the assist, Xeriar. ~ BerserkSeraph
 :Perhaps it's "qualities" in the Aristotelian sense? Only that would be a little backwards, because if I were going to try to tie the shinma to concepts from Aristotelian philosophy, I'd say that Nirakara was that which is without accidents, and Nirvishesha was that which is without essential nature. Or...wait. Nirguna ought to fit into that somehow...never mind.... --[[MF]]
-::Whee! I've already forgotten! ~[[BerserkSeraph]] <i>Being slightly crazier than usual</i>
+::Whee! I've already forgotten! ~BerserkSeraph <i>Being slightly crazier than usual</i>

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:15, 6 April 2010
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:35, 6 April 2010
(No difference)